2008: HOW HAS THE DEFINITION OF TRUST CHANGED? PR, MARKETING AND RETRUSTING
Monday, October 20th, 2008They used to construct the buildings that housed banks as if they were impenetrable stone fortresses. The symbolism was obvious: your money is safe with us. From kids with jars of pennies to young families and businesses of every shape and size, everyone put their hard-earned greenbacks into the hands of the banker, a person above reproach – someone you could trust to protect your money. Today, that trust is at question.
Once-heralded banks are now seen as symbols of greed and deceit, and politics is equated to corruption. It’s safe to say that the state of trust in 2008 is but a shadow of its former counterpart.
Who could have ever imagined that in the early stages of the 21st century the idea of a mattress being a safe place for money would be discussed, let alone acted on? So, who do you trust? What factors foster trust? And is the trust issue limited to the financial sector? I think not. Eaten any tomatoes with salmonella or E-coli in the last six months?
As a marketer of products, I think that today marketers must “over” prove their trustworthiness, because consumers today are “resistant to being sold to.” This is true across the country, unbounded by belief or status: blue state, red state, urban, suburban and rural.
Welcome to the age of retrusting.
Ronn Torossian
5WPR








